26 February 2018
Stopping School Shootings
Preventing school shootings in the U.S., like Parkland, will
take a lot more than reducing mentally disturbed persons’ access to
firearms. That might make it more
difficult for potential mass killers to carry out their awful schemes; but it
won’t alter their desire to resolve personal issues by resorting to extreme
antisocial behavior. Simplifying the
American problem with violence to ready access to firearms is our way of
disguising our basic societal flaw of protecting individual liberty at the cost
of disregarding responsible communal boundaries. This is a weakness in the American system
that must be addressed with a painstaking effort by concerned citizens to
correct it even though it would mean admitting that American exceptionalism has
a detestable aspect too.
Is there anything unusual about American society’s
vulnerability to violent outbursts like school shootings? Other wealthy nations do not seem to suffer
the same weakness. It is not only easy
access to firearms that distinguishes America.
I would argue that the principle of individual freedom to rebel against the perceived unmerited third-party imposition
of control over personal behavior leads us to encourage breakages of communal
standards that cause some of us to ignore traffic rules, evade income tax
regulations, and even to extinguish innocent children’s lives.
Banning bump-stock or automatic weapons sales won’t prevent
the unwarranted mass killings--banning matches won’t reduce arson; like a
traffic barrier, it will only make their execution more challenging. What is needed is a difficult, persistent and
imaginative campaign to change our expectation that life’s frustrations and
outrages can equally be resolved by simple measures. Preventing blazes of violence will require constant investment in vigilance
and treatment of possible perpetrators.
19 February 2018
Why I Read About The14th Century
I don’t learn anything to remember from Barbara Tuchman’s “A
Distant Mirror.” It merely distracts me
from my daily chores and compelling business pursuits. It submits me to a delusion of participating
in another time, six hundred years earlier when kings and princes were endowed
by their subjects with wealth apparently earned by their toil and paid
unquestioningly as their tribute to a class of rulers installed over them by
the Almighty. No one—not the peasants
nor the nobility—even suspected there was any other way of life. Not until the Enlightenment was the idea
believed that people had any right to determine how they were governed or what
they owned.