<$BlogRSDUrl$>

29 July 2015


Thinking Again on Iran

The outrageous essay by Melanie Sturm in the July 26, 2015 Steamboat Pilot & Today tries to discredit the recent sanctions-ending accord the U.S. and Western powers have negotiated with Iran by falsely accusing its leaders (the Ayatollahs) of genocide and comparing the agreement to famously exaggerated failures to win impossible concessions from the mad national leaders of Nazi Germany and isolated North Korea. 

Fighting a war with a neighboring country like Iraq or supporting a proxy battle by a politically sympathetic organization like Hezbollah in Lebanon do not constitute genocide.  All wars end up killing people.

It is not true that the Munich or Pyongyang Agreements led to war.  WWII was inevitable and the Kim Il Sung regime and its successors are only dangerous to their own people.  No harm was done by the agreements negotiated by Chamberlain and Clinton.  In fact, to the extent that their enemies believed that the British and Americans actually felt more at ease, those adversaries might have been lulled into rash actions that only contribute to ultimate defeat.

This may be the case with regard to the nuclear deal with Iran.  The terms of that agreement buy up to 10, 15 years or more before particular mass destruction weapons are added to Iran’s arsenal.  That’s better than the possibility of immediate proliferation.  Of course, it will require vigilant monitoring—but the words of one of Ms. Sturm’s heroes, Ronald Reagan, “Trust but Verify” apply to the nuclear deal with Iran as much as to any other diplomatic agreement.

Moreover, the accord recognizes the fact that in today’s world it is futile to seek a commitment from a totally foreign culture, like the Shia Muslim regime that currently governs Iran, to accept the same goals that the West (even including Russia) has set for itself.  The West can no longer ignore other civilizations in calculating the common welfare.  Technology has made all ideologies compelling.  Until the people of Iran change the rule of their country to a system that is more consistent with the values of the West, we will have to accept that Iran does not want to “rejoin the civilized world.”  Its value system defines the world in which it wishes to exist very differently.

Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?