25 October 2022
Abortion and the Definition of Life
The U.S. Constitutional democratic system was not created by religious faith, nor vice versa. It expressly prohibits its use to enforce religious dogma.
The definition of a political or biological life is not the same
as a faith-based definition of life. Therefore, Constitutional regulation of
life termination must rely on secular laws or popular consensus.
The Constitutional issue here is not the right to life of a fetus. The issue is the right of a religious group to impose its cultural mores on others. Other citizens have different views on the issue of abortion that do not prevent the achievement of the goals of the Constitution, which can be summarized as the promotion of the general welfare.
Murder of society’s members certainly contradicts that goal. However, the Constitution can only recognize at most a potentially (not hypothetically) autonomous human being as one of society’s members. That makes abortion’s effect on Constitutional life a matter of science, not faith—exactly as specified by Roe vs. Wade.
Codifying the abortion standard in that USSC decision would likely give rise to another legal challenge. With luck a majority of the Court will be harder to find for overturning such a law
Ultimately, the Constitution guarantees that individuals who
hold as a matter of faith that life begins at conception cannot be compelled to
disregard that belief, e.g. by being forced to abort a fetus, no matter how
premature. On the other hand, the
Constitution does guarantee a mother’s right to abort a non-viable fetus, which
is not biologically able to exist autonomously, until it is biologically able
to live autonomously as a protected member of society, even if only through
medical intervention. The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion; and
that means a religious belief in the beginning of life at conception cannot be
imposed on anyone in the country.