11 February 2023
Stifling Disinformation vs Free Speech
U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and Dr. Anthony Fauci have prominently decried the false information regarding vaccines for COVID-19. Many progressive and other liberal politicians have angrily objected to the characterization of their propositions as elitism by their opponents on the right.
The defenders of the truth also have the duty to influence
the public, not just to complain. The First Amendment protects us from exploitation
only if the right to speak convincingly is exercised by defenders of the common
welfare as effectively as it is by special interests or polemicists.
Yes, free speech sometimes is more effectively used by
enemies of common sense than by other critical thinkers. This has always been a
problem in social organizations. Benjamin Franklin published his thoughts on
the matter; so have many other leaders before and since. However, gullibility
to persistent and determined deceit is part of human nature. Advances in
communications technology have, unfortunately, at times surpassed the
capabilities or desires of common human intelligence to think clearly and
critically about the misinformation that false prophets profess more effectively
than they. Objective truth may not be as
compelling as factual distortions presented well.
While misinformation may be combatted on its merits, the same harmful messages must also be corrected by exposing the antisocial motivation of the deceivers. It’s a tricky task, particularly in a liberal democracy where free speech is sanctified.