<$BlogRSDUrl$>

04 October 2023

Is The U.S. a Zero-Sum Society? 

Anne Case and Angus Deaton find it hard to imagine that an educated elite can prosper indefinitely without a better future for everyone else,” in their guest essay in the 3 October 2023 NYTimes, "Without a College Degree, Life in America Is Staggeringly Shorter."  Are U.S. college students taught that their good fortune at graduating into the “elite” only comes at the expense of the rest of Americans?  Do they learn that later?

Case and Deaton point out that the same is less true in other economically advanced countries. Many of those countries have more equitable healthcare systems and cover other social costs through government programs rather than through private sector enterprise. The latter is one of the supposed benefits of guaranteeing personal freedom. It also results, though, in divergent living conditions (and longevities) between social classes.

Is it right to use anticipated lifestyle as an incentive for building a more advanced economy or attaining a higher level of intellectual achievement? If genetic proclivity to master the skills needed to excel in science, business, academia, and other aspects of civilization were distributed equally to everyone, the kick in the pants that that incentive constitutes might be enough to maximize social advancement. Alas, genetic endowment varies randomly at best, and often unfairly.

Correcting that biological result is a feature of what is derided in America as socialism. And still, achieving a truly positive-sum society would require spreading access to the social benefits that are within easier reach of those who are lucky enough to have won the involuntary lottery of where and to whom they were born.

Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?